Lowest guaranteed price across the globe. Get upto 50% off ! Book Now

Statistical Method Fall 2016 Sample Assignment

University: Blackburn College

  • Unit No: 7
  • Level: High school
  • Pages: 16 / Words 4020
  • Paper Type: Assignment
  • Course Code: N/A
  • Downloads: 5329
Question :

This sample will guide you through:

  • Introduction on Statistical Method
  • Review of Immigration
Answer :
Organization Selected : N/A

Introduction

Social science theory is related with general theories that presents the actions as well as behavior of the society on whole. It encompasses sociological, political as well as philosophical ideas. Social theory is being utilized towards distinction as well as generalizing between different kind of societies and to make analysis of modernity as it has been emerged in the past few centuries. In the present study the issues faced by immigrants are being assessed as this relating with the society who are facing certain issues due to immigration. The cultural patterns that are being existing in the country is assessed. The question are being framed in accordance with such.

Review

Immigration is regarded as the international movement of the individual into the destination country of which they are not the natives. Further they do not have the citizenship for the purpose of settling down specifically as permanent residents. With such there is various issues attached that are being faced by the people of society. This is attached with both people who are migrating and the one who are already residing internationally. This can be in terms of job opportunities and cultural aspect. Along with this the extent to which the law are developed related with discrimination among the country reveals the amount of discrimination that can be done towards immigrants. These are regarded as several aspects that related with social science which has greater impact on society in whole. Thus such factors are taken into accounts so that study can be carried out in an effective manner.

The aims and objectives related with social science are enumerated in the manner below:

Aim:

The aim of the present research is: To identify if immigrants face discrimination issues

Research questions

  • Do immigrants impact cultural pattern prevailing within country?
  • Do immigrants qualification affects the job opportunities for the people who are the resident of the country?
  • What is relationship between individual’s perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants?
  • What is the impact of government’s behavior & shared religious patter on immigrants’ way to feel closer to the country?

Analysis

Theme 1: Immigrants impact on cultural pattern prevailing within country?

Correlations

 

Immigration bad or good for country's economy

Country's cultural life undermined or enriched by immigrants

Immigration bad or good for country's economy

Pearson Correlation

1

.589**

Sig. (2-tailed)

 

.000

N

1752

1739

Country's cultural life undermined or enriched by immigrants

Pearson Correlation

.589**

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.000

 

N

1739

1773

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Interpretation: In the above analysis table society changes and its impact on the people is being assessed. This is important factors in the social theory. This is being done by the using tool such as correlation. Correlation is regarded as the mutual association among the two variables. From the table above it has been analyzed that value of significance is 0.589. This implies that it is above 0.05. Thus it reflects that there is no significant difference among the variables. With this it can be stated that immigrants to greater extent affects the cultural patterns that exists within the country.

Theme 2: Immigrants qualification affects the job opportunities for the people who are the resident of the country

Model Summary

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.291a

.085

.083

1.869

a. Predictors: (Constant), Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country, Qualification for immigration: speak country's official language, Qualification for immigration: good educational qualifications, Qualification for immigration: work skills needed in country

ANOVA

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

545.792

4

136.448

39.082

.000b

Residual

5882.860

1685

3.491

   

Total

6428.651

1689

     

a. Dependent Variable: Immigrants take jobs away in country or create new jobs

b. Predictors: (Constant), Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country, Qualification for immigration: speak country's official language, Qualification for immigration: good educational qualifications, Qualification for immigration: work skills needed in country

Coefficients

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

7.692

.128

 

60.297

.000

Qualification for immigration: good educational qualifications

.036

.024

.052

1.523

.128

Qualification for immigration: speak country's official language

-.026

.018

-.046

-1.489

.137

Qualification for immigration: work skills needed in country

-.068

.022

-.108

-3.115

.002

Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country

-.163

.020

-.224

-8.180

.000

a. Dependent Variable: Immigrants take jobs away in country or create new jobs

Interpretation: Regression is regarded as the measure of relation among the mean value of one variable as well as corresponding value of other variables. The table above reflects impact of variables relating to qualifications on the immigrants taking away the job or creating the job. It can be interpreted that significance value of sound educational qualification is 0.128. This reflects that such is higher than significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is no significant difference among good educational qualification and job taken away by immigrants. This reflects that educational qualification among the immigrants has greater impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country. This demonstrates lack of job opportunities for the one who are local resident of the particular country.

Further the significance value of Qualification for immigration: speak country's official language is 0.137. This reflects that such is higher that significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is no significant difference among speaking country’s official language and job taken away by immigrants. This reflects that speaking official language by immigrants has greater impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country. This demonstrates reduction in job opportunities for the one who are local resident of the particular country.

On the other hand the significance value of Qualification for immigration: work skills needed in country is 0.002. This reflects that such is lower that significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is significant difference among working skills needed within the country and job taken away by immigrants. This reflects that working skills needed in the country has no impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country.

Along with this the significance value of Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country is 0.000. This reflects that such is lower that significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is significant difference among Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country and job taken away by immigrants. This reflects that way of life in the country has no impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country.

Overall it can be stated that there is weaker relationship among the variables and qualifications and creation or taking away of job by the immigrants.

Theme 3: Relationship between individual’s perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants

ANOVA

 

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

Discrimination of respondent's group: colour or race

Between Groups

.074

10

.007

1.182

.298

Within Groups

10.857

1742

.006

   

Total

10.931

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: nationality

Between Groups

.117

10

.012

1.041

.406

Within Groups

19.654

1742

.011

   

Total

19.772

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: religion

Between Groups

.070

10

.007

1.034

.412

Within Groups

11.848

1742

.007

   

Total

11.918

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: language

Between Groups

.052

10

.005

1.010

.433

Within Groups

8.902

1742

.005

   

Total

8.954

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: ethnic group

Between Groups

.112

10

.011

1.045

.403

Within Groups

18.682

1742

.011

   

Total

18.794

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: age

Between Groups

.119

10

.012

.957

.480

Within Groups

21.605

1742

.012

   

Total

21.724

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: gender

Between Groups

1.023

10

.102

2.983

.001

Within Groups

59.713

1742

.034

   

Total

60.736

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: sexuality

Between Groups

.009

10

.001

.299

.982

Within Groups

4.977

1742

.003

   

Total

4.986

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: disability

Between Groups

.063

10

.006

.933

.501

Within Groups

11.854

1742

.007

   

Total

11.918

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: other grounds

Between Groups

.162

10

.016

.573

.837

Within Groups

49.354

1742

.028

   

Total

49.516

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: don't know

Between Groups

.001

10

.000

.109

1.000

Within Groups

.999

1742

.001

   

Total

.999

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: refusal

Between Groups

.000

10

.000

.

.

Within Groups

.000

1742

.000

   

Total

.000

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: not applicable

Between Groups

1.901

10

.190

2.527

.005

Within Groups

131.105

1742

.075

   

Total

133.006

1752

     

Discrimination of respondent's group: no answer

Between Groups

.000

10

.000

.

.

Within Groups

.000

1742

.000

   

Total

.000

1752

     

Interpretation: From the above table it can be interpreted that the significance in case of all the discrimination variables that is on the basis of color or race, nationality, language, ethnic group, age, sexuality, religion and disability, other groups is higher than 0.05. This implies that there is no significant association among the variables. Such reflects that there is greater relationship amongindividual’s perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants. On the other it has been examined that discrimination of respondent's group: gender has significance value that 0.001. This is less than 0.05. Hence is there is significant difference among the variables. Thus implies that individual’s perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants on basis of gender have no relationship.

Theme 4: The impact of government’s behavior & shared religious patter on immigrants’ way to feel closer to the country

Model Summary

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.133a

.018

.016

.567

a. Predictors: (Constant), Compared to yourself government treats new immigrants better or worse, Better for a country if almost everyone shares customs and traditions

ANOVA

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

8.693

2

4.346

13.500

.000b

Residual

483.884

1503

.322

   

Total

492.577

1505

     

a. Dependent Variable: Feel close to country

b. Predictors: (Constant), Compared to yourself government treats new immigrants better or worse, Better for a country if almost everyone shares customs and traditions

Coefficients

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

B

Std. Error

Beta

1

(Constant)

1.109

.067

 

16.480

.000

Better for a country if almost everyone shares customs and traditions

.067

.015

.115

4.343

.000

Compared to yourself government treats new immigrants better or worse

.027

.017

.041

1.560

.119

a. Dependent Variable: Feel close to country

Interpretation: The table above reflects impact of government’s behavior & shared religious patter on immigrants’ way to feel closer to the country. It can be interpreted that significance value of Better for a country if almost everyone shares customs and traditions is 0.000. This reflects that such is lower than significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is significant difference among shared religion and immigrant’s way of getting closer to country. This reflects that shared religion has greater impact on the way of immigrants getting closer to the country.

On the other hand it can be stated that significance value of government treats new immigrants is 0.119. This reflects that such is higher than significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is no significant difference among government treats and immigrant’s way of getting closer to country. This reflects that treatment from government has greater impact on the way of immigrants getting closer to the country.

Conclusion

It can be concluded from the present study that immigrants to greater extent affects the cultural patterns that exists within the country. get the best homework help from a professional writer with coursework help. This is because the people who are migrating to another nation can be influenced by the change in the culture. Along with this it has been inferred that way of life in the country has no impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country. Further it is being assessed that individual’s perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants on basis of gender have no relationship. Moreover treatment from government has greater impact on the way of immigrants getting closer to the country.

Download Full Sample
Cite This Work To export references to this Sample, select the desired referencing style below:
Copy to Clipboard
Copy to Clipboard
Copy to Clipboard
Copy to Clipboard
Instant Assignment Help. [Internet]. Instant Assignment Help.(2024), Retrieved from: https://www.instantassignmenthelp.com/free-samples/statistics/statistical-method-fall-2016-sample-assignment
Copy to Clipboard
Boost Grades & Leave Stress

Share Your Requirements Now for Customized Solutions.

Lowest Price

USD6.27

    FOR FIRST ORDER GET EXTRA 25% OFF

    Seasonal seasonal-mobile

    Our unique Features

    24/7 Customer Support

    100% Customer Satisfaction

    No Privacy Infringement

    Quick Services

    Subject Experts

    Innovative Documents

    100+ Qualified Writers

    For Best (Accounting) Assignment Help

    Tristin Green
    1455 - Completed Orders
    Tristin GreenView Profile Hire Me
    Cyrus Wilson
    289 - Completed Orders
    Cyrus WilsonView Profile Hire Me
    Norman Gray
    489 - Completed Orders
    Norman GrayView Profile Hire Me
    Peter Johnson
    1215 - Completed Orders
    Peter JohnsonView Profile Hire Me
    View All Writers
     
    IAH whatsapp

    Limited Time Offer

    Exclusive Library Membership + FREE Wallet Balance